Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Whitten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Whitten

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Politicians who once hoped and campaigned for being mayor are not at all inherited notability from those events themselves alone, my own searches are mirroring this by simply finding trivial coverage about the campaign events, I'll actually note this was started in 2012, presumably part of his then-campaign, and this was in fact then accepted with all of this information last year, therefore it shows he's literally not known for anything else, and the fact this article was accepted with the same 2012-set facts, shows he's not notable for any capacities. Another note is that because it seems this Draft was started as part of his political and PR campaign, the article itself is formatted like an advertisement. SwisterTwister talk 21:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This guy is so far below notable there is nothing close to a question.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:UPANDCOMING. I'm not against a userfication. He's gotten some media attention, but not in any ongoing and significant way. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too much of one event. Aboutmovies (talk) 19:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.