Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Windust (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:32, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron Windust

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently deleted I am going to paraphrase Spiderone's nominating statement, since this is almost identical to the article which was deleted: "Neither of the three references demonstrate significant coverage per WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG. Would have passed WP:NFOOTBALL prior to 2022 but that and WP:FPL are no longer relevant so articles must contain significant coverage. Best sources found in WP:BEFORE were The Inner Sanctum, I'm not sure if this is WP:RS or not and he is only mentioned twice in passing, Football NSW, which mentions him in passing as a goalscorer, and The Football Sack, which mentions him once, saying that he made his debut. None of the above sources contain any detailed coverage of Windust. An Australian search only yielded the usual database sites which are not acceptable for SPORTBASIC." There was also a brief discussion on the talk page. But still zero in-depth independent sources. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - at risk of being verbally abused again like I was in the previous AfD, the subject still does not meet WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG, which would be the only relevant guidelines for Windust. I would also recommend SALT due to the article being recreated multiple times and the previous AfD consensus not being respected (see here). If this gets sent to draft again, it will get moved back again and we will then need a 3rd AfD. Same case as Jackson Khoury. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT - nothing has changed since last AFD, no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 01:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.