Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CapTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Vanamonde (talk) 17:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CapTech

CapTech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please see the history which has consisted of nothing but the company's own PR and the company itself apparently actually removed my own PROD in March. SwisterTwister talk 21:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is still not convincing or substantial enough; the article is altogether questionable and simply making some changes is not taking away the concerns as a whole. SwisterTwister talk 20:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CapTech, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.