Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CareerStructure.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CareerStructure.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NWEB, WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 19:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The sourcesseem sufficient to showi tsa major company in the field. DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep vexatious nomination. Lightburst (talk) 21:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.