Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlsbad Village Drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carlsbad Village Drive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable local street created by 21rojasjustyn (talk · contribs). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton Parkway, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Avenue, Irvine, California for more context. David Eppstein (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Perhaps merge with major roads in that region but otherwise the article is pointless. SVUKnight (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article creator has been removing deletion notices from these articles, in this case leading The Mirror Cracked to accidentally create a second deletion nomination for the same article. I have redirected it to this discussion, but their nomination statement was lost in the process, so here it is again. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete `Article is unsourced and does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Per the US Streets wikiproject, streets are generally not notable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton Parkway, suffering from the same problems, (re-)created by the same author. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOROAD even though I disagree with this, it does state that :as such, this road qualifies as notable. Were it up to me, I'd request reliable sources showing notability, but that's not what this policy says. This isn't a county road, it's described as the main road in a town, so yes, it's notable. Necromonger...We keep what we kill 12:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—not notable. @Wekeepwhatwekill: it's not a state highway or higher classification, so under WP:GEOROAD, the article must pass the WP:GNG without any benefit of the doubt based on its classification. Imzadi 1979 → 14:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Reiterating what Imzadi says above, there is no indication of notability. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wekeepwhatwekill has misunderstood GEOROAD. An arterial road or even "main street of Carlsbad" is not a highway. Reywas92^Talk 22:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable road Celestina007 (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if it's notable, there'd be available sources... fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 13:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with others; fails WP:GEOROAD. MB 02:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.