Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carsten Graff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carsten Graff

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been listed for notability concerns since 2014. Although Graff has created a variety of content easily available online, I can't find any independent secondary sources to satisfy WP:BASIC, nor does the significance of his work appear to meet WP:AUTHOR. Uffda608 (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Denmark and Authors. Uffda608 (talk) 16:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. One source in the article orimary, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed more primary, failing WP:IS. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if sources are added to the article that meet WP:IS WP:SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 00:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.