Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castlemourn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Ed Greenwood#Personal life and other activities. Daniel (talk) 18:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Castlemourn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N. Prod (by Piotrus) was removed as merge/redirect was considered a possibility by Daranios. I wouldn't agree with a merge, as all this is unsourced information, and I am not sure where would be a suitable redirect target, though I am open to that as an WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 17:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Games. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 17:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Ed Greenwood#Personal life and other activities at this point, where there is a sourced mention of the campaign setting. I'd like to see a half-sentence of description merged like the "post-apocalyptic" added at the target, which would be fine based on the primary source, but cannot verify it myself. Castlemourn does appear in a few secondary sources, so I think outright deletion is not warranted. The sources I have seen, on the other hand, probably do not provide enough for a stand-alone article. Daranios (talk) 18:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge now rather than redirect as there is referenced content to merge, in agreement with what's been said by the others below. Daranios (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Ed Greenwood as per above. BOZ (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge since now there is some referenced content, but consensus on talk was that GNG for stand alone article is not met. Ping participants of talk discussion: @Daranios, Jclemens, and Susmuffin:. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Ed Greenwood#Personal life and other activities: While this campaign setting does not appear to have been meaningfully discussed in reliable sources, there is a small amount of sourced information that could be placed in its creator's article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• merge per above unless someone finds better sourcing. The sourcing is borderline for meeting WP:N, but editorially a merge is the right outcome. I'm guessing it will be about a paragraph once done. Hobit (talk) 00:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per all. I'm always relieved to see more people embracing merge as an WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.