Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celeris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Celeris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is recently created - But Celeris are not notable outside of the Virtual Pool series, which already has a comprehensive list of articles. If they had created other games, then, this would be ok.

Article should be deleted/returned to redirect. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An RfD revolved around it producing another game, FlixMix. But FlixMix is tagged for notability since July 2012, so the consensus here will revolve around that game's notability. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of there being a second notable game that was created by the studio, that doesn't automatically make the studio themselves notable. There are a lot of non-notable studios that have produced lots of notable games, however, they are possibly notable for the Virtual Pool series, (and potentially FlixMix), but that doesn't make the studio themselves notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 19:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find any significant coverage of the company itself. I lean against redirecting per WP:XY but I don't know if we really want to rehash the RfD. Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.