Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not much discussion, even after two relists. Going to call this a WP:SOFTDELETE -- RoySmith (talk) 02:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial Season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had only passing mentions in a music reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 03:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar 03:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Searches at News, Books, browsers, Highbeam, Blabbermouth, Kerrang and Terrorizer found nothing convincingly better at all. SwisterTwister talk 07:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.