Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified in Production and Inventory Management
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to APICS. (non-admin closure) Winged BladesGodric 04:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Certified in Production and Inventory Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable certification, atleast not notable enough for a stand-alone article. Wikipedia is not a web host to provide excessive internal information or a mirror for a topic's official website. I have now added a short description to the APICS main article. Normally I would just redirect this page, but for a fully developed article with lots of COI editing an AfD discussion is probably better. GermanJoe (talk) 07:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 07:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 07:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 07:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- This certification is already covered in APICS. Unnecessary FORK. Rhadow (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, @Rhadow:: I already copied some content to the main article to improve the main article and to preserve a relevant basic description (attributed in edit history). So it's technically not a fork - sorry for the confusion. Obviously I agree that most of the overly detailed content is not needed and unencyclopedic, but a brief mention in the main article was worth keeping. GermanJoe (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, GermanJoe, your copy makes perfect sense. My description of FORK referred to the original creation of Certified in Production and Inventory Management. Let it be gone. Rhadow (talk) 13:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to coverage of the certification within APICS article. --Doncram (talk) 02:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to APICS. Mentioned there. feminist (talk) 12:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.