Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Painchaud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Painchaud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE sources. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not winning any notable awards or playing in a high enough league for very long. Yosemiter (talk) 21:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sources to pass GNG and not enough achievement to pass the notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No particular achievements and only scant coverage in secondary sources. Imalawyer (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - falls short of NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 21:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:NHOCKEY. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.