Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak Hamid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chak Hamid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not at all a notable subject, completely fails WP:GNG. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 11:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 11:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per criterion #1 of WP:GEOLAND unless it's demonstrated the village isn't legally recognised. Uanfala (talk) 11:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passing WP:GEOLAND ,most villages are considered notable Atlantic306 (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND criterion #1.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.