Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaley Scott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 02:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaley Scott

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am Chaley Scott, this entry isn't accurate and is exaggerated and I wish for it to be deleted immediately. Thanks. Chaley.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaleyscott (talk • contribs)

Comment The above nomination had been flagged on the article but had not been copied to the log. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At the very least, I think this biography needs a complete rewrite. It's more of a rant against progressive parenting than it is a biography. Even if this article were kept, I don't think this would be a very useful base. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The sections Views on Parenting, Childcare, and Criticisms and Controversy have nothing to do with this subject. They might belong in an article on Progressive parenting (unless one exists under a different name already). LionMans Account (talk) 18:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any sources. Is the article a hoax? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
- I wondered that, too, but I decided it wasn't worth my time to investigate further. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject certainly exists: worldcat finds two books, The unchained child (in one library) and The shepherdess (in twelve). Nevertheless we don't have any evidence of passing WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.