Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Challa Subrahmanyam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Challa Subrahmanyam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's put this to rest. Already deleted twice via prod and no changes since the last time - all of these grandiose claims are sourced to exactly nothing (personal websites aside.) I can find no evidence that this person meets inclusion criteria or any reliable sources that cover them in depth. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I was just about to nominate this article for deletion as well. Puffery and conflict of interest aside, there are no reliable sources listed, and I haven't been able to find any to add. Therefore, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:AUTHOR. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and above editor. Bakazaka (talk) 23:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - fails WP:GNG, especially the "significant coverage in reliable sources" part.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.