Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandrajit Banerjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 14:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chandrajit Banerjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unequivocal promo. Article makes two claims to notability: the subject is a director general of an organisation and the subject received a "China-India Friendship" award a few years back. However, both claims are insufficient for WP:ANYBIO. Article is mostly the work of User:Karansharma1, a indeffed as a sock of a promotion-only sockmaster. — kashmiri ^TALK 11:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Head of an exceptionally notable organisation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) is an exceptionally notable organization of high importance in India. head of such organization is also notable and moreover, there is significant coverage in the news about the subject. I have found many sources in the Google search and clearly passes WP:GNG.KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 02:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. See this Google Books search. Easily enough sources there to meet WP:GNG, not to mention the fact that he's in charge of an extremely notable organization. Omni Flames (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.