Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapman Partnership

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chapman Partnership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (at least to Wiki standards) and my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) and here and here with mostly local articles and I'm sure searches at local news sources would find more but I'm not sure if this would even be locally notable. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also appreciate input with this one, DGG. SwisterTwister talk 00:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no indication of notability, probably not even indication of significance -- and could have been deleted via speedy A7 DGG ( talk ) 05:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.