Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character Creator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Character Creator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no significant coverage of this product. It seems to me that the term (minus the capitals I guess) could be a useful redirect but I can't judge that. Drmies (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Software. Skynxnex (talk) 20:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it lacks significant RS coverage, and there's no relevant redirect target.--Alexandra^IDV 14:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. It's such a generic name that it's hard to find sources for, and searching for something more direct like"Character Creator" "SandBar" only turns up forum posts. Given that the lone reference in the article is from 1989 it's very possible that there were sources that just aren't available online anymore or are print-only. However, my wishful thinking on that matter isn't sufficient, notability needs to be established, and this article doesn't do that. - Aoidh (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.