Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Dragon Prince (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dragon Prince and Dragon Star trilogies#Characters. Two editors favored Deletion while one favored a Redirect and one said they wouldn't object to a redirect so as the closer's decision, I went with the redirect option. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Characters of Dragon Prince

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A totally unrefenced plot summary in the form of a character list. Not much we can do with this piece of WP:FANCRUFT, rescue-wise, I am afraid. Unencyclopedic plot summary, failing WP:NLIST, WP:GNG, etc. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Violation of WP:NOTPLOT. None of current content is salvageable and is WP:OR, so at the very least WP:TNT applies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dragon Prince and Dragon Star trilogies#Characters. Though that article's not exactly in great shape itself, it does have a list of characters that offers about the right level of depth and detail (i.e. not much). If this had been recently created there'd be an argument for deleting before redirecting to forestall any efforts to recreate it, but as it was mostly written by one long-since inactive editor in the mid-aughts there's probably not much risk of that. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ stated, none of the current contents of this article is appropriate for merging or preserving as it is entirely in-universe plot information that has no sources. I wouldn't be particularly opposed to a Redirect as suggested by Arms & Hearts, I just don't think it is a particularly useful search term. Rorshacma (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.