Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charitable work by Stella Vine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stella Vine. I'm not going to request protection since the article has only been created one, it can be requested to enforce the outcome of this AfD if required. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Charitable work by Stella Vine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unjustified promotional content fork from Stella Vine. The news sources that are still accessible mention Vine's charitable donations only briefly. Vine is evidently a notable artist but a balanced and commensurate mention of her major donations can be easily slipped into the main article. Sionk (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to main article. There's no need for this to be a separate article. It's odd and perhaps a little bit suspicious that Vine has a longer article than many more distinguished/famous/influential artists (e.g. Sarah Lucas, Sam Taylor-Wood, Wolfgang Tillmans, David Shrigley) and while we don't correct that by shortening Vine's article, there's equally no reason to create a thicket of Sarah Vine pages around Wikipedia. --Colapeninsula (talk) 22:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...It's not as if there is much scope for this article to be expanded significantly. --Colapeninsula (talk) 23:25, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the main article...Modernist (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and salt - this is just PR by fans. To be honest, I've never heard of the subject. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.