Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Fleming (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Fleming

Charlotte Fleming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous 2 AfDs resulted in clear consensus to delete. My rationale for this 3rd AfD will be basically the same as what User:Dougal18 said in the previous one. Fleming does not seem to meet WP:GNG and articles from clubs that she plays for or used to play for are not independent of the subject so do not confer notability. FA WSL Full Time is the only source that I can find that might contribute towards GNG but, on its own, is not enough.

Source analysis will follow shortly. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with WP:SALT. I can't think of a time when it's been applied to a female footballer but the fact that this has been recreated so many times against consensus is deeply concerning. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Fleming (3rd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.