Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherry Shares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Shares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, mostly original research; no reliable sources mention this scheme, and this has been the case for over a decade White 720 (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Site appears to be defunct and I can't find anything about it at this point in time. Oaktree b (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Websites, and Hong Kong. Skynxnex (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article text is predominantly speculative around this firm and possibly related others and their conduct, which would fall under WP:ILLCON. I am not seeing reliable sources which demonstrate lasting notability was attained here. AllyD (talk) 20:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.