Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheyenne Tozzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheyenne Tozzi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability Nswix (talk) 15:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ delete Sydney Morning Herald [1] somewhat fluffy piece on her, more hits in the Daily Mail than I can count. We'd probably dig and find more sources about her; what's given in the article now isn't helping. This in a woman's magazine? [2]. This where she lists her fave drinks [3]. It's all fluff, delete.Oaktree b (talk) 20:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking reliable coverage, seems most coverage is trivia as Oaktree points out above. LibStar (talk) 02:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At best a celebrity but has no inherent notability. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NMODEL. Cabrils (talk) 04:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there are no reliable sources which describes her significantly. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMODEL. Nasin3030 (talk) 14:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.