Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi Nguyen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Nguyen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sexuality and gender, Vietnam, and New York. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we lack the level of quality in-depth sourcing needed to show notability. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:GNG or WP:BIO is not realized. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom lacks third party sourcing WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.