Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chicoo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No google hits for the item or its references. No claim of importance. Previously rejected as a speedy but this looks like a hoax. Secretlondon (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Secretlondon (talk) 13:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've put db-hoax on it, the references are characters from The Office... Reywas92^Talk 16:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Bbb23, I don't see anything at WP:DP, WP:AFD, or WP:CSD that says a speedy deletion tag should not be added during an AFD. I've done it before, and I don't care if this vandalism page has been around since 2008, it's obviously a hoax created on April Fools Day and should be speedy deleted rather than waste anyone else's time for this to "play out". Reywas92^Talk 20:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and add it to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia Ratnahastin (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.