Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimestone (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chimestone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted by AfD here. Still fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND JMHamo (talk) 08:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (possibly WP:SPEEDY#G11): The only claims in the current article that might provide notability appear to be against WP:NBAND#7 (that their album sold 15000 copies and they "were chosen by The Seattle Times as one of the city’s most promising and talented new musical acts"). This is not evidenced by the Seattle Times 1993 source (an uncritical promotional interview that doesn't contribute to NBAND#1), the article is largely unreferenced with no further coverage found, and it's not obvious that even if the claims were substantiated that they'd be strong enough to meet NBAND#7 anyway. Notability of the NEVE Recording Console is WP:NOTINHERITED. ^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 09:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails GNG and is completely unsubstantiated. Seems to be WP:Promotional Insert CleverPhrase Here 10:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable like the 1st AfD, none of this is convincing enough. SwisterTwister talk 01:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability is still lacking. The sourcing in the article does not demonstrate notability nor can I find any coverage that would establish notability. --Whpq (talk) 01:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.