Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiranjeevi Jetty (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiranjeevi Jetty

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was re-created 3 days after its 2017 deletion following AFD, by the same article creator (blocked a few months later for (WP:NOTHERE). The original article isn't in the Wayback Machine, so unclear how close it is to the original. As before, he's a minor functionary in a political party, lacks WP:SIGCOV, and fails WP:POLITICIAN. Storchy (talk) 07:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Storchy (talk) 07:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Still non-notable. Agree with above. Oaktree b (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the above - no notability, more text in the references section than the article. Fails WP:NPOL; WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As an administrator, I can view the old deleted version — and while it was structurally somewhat different than this, there isn't any particularly meaningful difference in content, so it would be a tossup whether it was speediable or not. (I would have speedied, but some other administrators might not have.) This does not make any claim that he would pass any of Wikipedia's subject-specific inclusion tests at all, and is not referenced even remotely close to well enough to claim that he would pass WP:GNG instead of having to pass any SNGs. Bearcat (talk) 12:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, totally agree with him. He is far from passing WP:GNGMickeyMouse143 (talk) 09:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.