Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowk Shaheedan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Maqbool Bhat. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chowk Shaheedan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 08:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Appears to be a traffic circle, not a square. There may be a monument in the middle of it but short of coverage it would not be notable. Reywas92^Talk 18:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'Weak Delete' - I was unable to find coverage specifically about the square; I only found discussion of events that happened at the square and most of these were opening shops, and other passing mentions. I tried searching on the Urdu but found nothing notable. If significant coverage is found, e.g. in the Urdu press, then please ping me. Ross-c (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I had some luck and added 2 newspaper references from The News International and 1 reference from Zee News TV Channel website. Will keep looking, though, for more in-depth coverage and hopefully add it soon. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Maqbool Bhat. Most of the article is talking about Maqbool Bhat, anyway. All sources discuss Maqbool Bhat and not the subject. No evidence of notability. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note further 2 of the sources have nothing to do with the subject of the article - it is sourcing relating to Bhat. The third mentions the subject once, apparently as the site of a protest - it does not discuss the subject in any detail. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:35, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think there's a weak consensus that the content shouldn't exist, leaning on a redirect as an ATD, but I'm loathe to rely on that without more discussion and without a mention at the target. Regardless, this could use some better consideration of those sources, so one more relist shouldn't hurt.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.