Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Faiers (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Faiers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Exactly three Google News Hits, two are passing mentions (one is an advertisement) and then there's this [1], which isn't really enough to satisfy WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Article was originally written and later heavily edited by WayneRay (talk · contribs) (and his sockpuppet); Mr. Ray is personally connected to the subject, making it promotional/spammy in nature. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 23:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails notability requirements on Wikipedia due to lack of significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the article's subject. — Cirt (talk) 00:29, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks references that would establish notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 22:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks enough sources to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as simply nothing for signs of independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.