Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Calcano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Calcano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and BLP. Article sourced entirely to the website of the Wizards of the Coast game company. LavaBaron (talk) 12:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -Meets the subject-specific criteria here (200+ pro points)Tazerdadog (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we don't even know the basic biographical details of this guy: date and place of birth, for example. For someone who's supposedly "notable" that's a red flag. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Date of birth added, I'm not sure why place of birth is even in the template, it seems pretty random. Tazerdadog (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable gamesman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Please note that there were significant procedural errors in this nomination. In addition to not being properly transcluded in the log, the find sources template did not refer to the correct person and has only just been fixed. This may have obscured relevant sources to the commenters above. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:09, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Again, it might be good to create a list to merge these players into. Hobit (talk) 03:55, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.