Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Alvarez

Christipher Alvàrez is a beast😇

Christopher Alvarez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find stats on this player, but that alone isn't enough to pass WP:ATHLETE, as he has never played professionally. It also doesn't help that the article looks like it was copy-pasted from somewhere. Erpert (let's talk about it) 21:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added an article created by the same user for another basketball player, for the same reason. In addition, the user admitted that he is cousins with both of the players, which constitutes a COI violation (yes, I know that isn't a deletion criterion, but...). Erpert (let's talk about it) 21:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only do we have a conflict of interest, but I refer to WP:ATHLETE - he hasn't made the pro leagues at this point. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:47, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The COI is, for me at least, a non-issue in this AfD discussion. The solution to poorly written articles isn't deletion. What is an issue is that this article fails WP:ATHLETE. It is for that reason that I believe this article should be deleted.--Piast 93 23:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - both totally non-notable athletes. --Orange Mike | Talk 05:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Totally non-notable. Though I was able to find stats for Alvarez, he was a scrub player and doesn't meet notability standards. The other guy I can't understand the article well enough to even begin to check, but it should go to. Rikster2 (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.