Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Atamian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sources present with SIGCOV and GNG. Closing as keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Atamian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable writer and film-maker who fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Possibly WP:UPE. Jamiebuba (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like it if you could please specify why the Article fails to correspond to WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.
The references provided are from independent sources, and in my opinion a significant coverage was shown in those resources about the person in question, his work, prizes/nominations, and the contribution to the Armenian culture.
Also, if there are any suggestions of how I can improve the Article to fully correspond to the guidelines I would very much appreciate that.
Thanks a lot Asti.96 (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may need to read the guideline for Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline which can help you know whether an article is ready for mainspace (if draft) or inclusive on wikipedia. WP: SIGCOV means Significant Coverage and WP: GNG I had already explained. I will review the article again and know how best I can try. I also see some what of promotional words WP: UPE and to avoid disputing the neutrality if any to declare whether you are paid or associated to the subject All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamiebuba I had thought why you AFD this article. Although it reads promotional but I suggest tagging and improving can work. Seeing the page alone cited works and per citations from some reliable courses, seems to pass WP: GNG and WP: SIGCOV except from removing promotional words and copy editing. Remember Deletion is not the best option when article can/may survive stand alone or WP: THREE. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Atamian, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.