Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher C. Lee
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Christopher C. Lee
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Christopher C. Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article, Christopher C. Lee, fails to meet notability criteria per WP:NOTABILITY and WP:CREATIVE. A web search reveals mostly primary sources and no reliable secondary sources that indicate that he is widely known or has significantly contributed to the overall field of photography. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as I could find no WP:RS to Verify any of the claims. Seems like a hard working commercial photographer, who has done some work for notable clients, but none of that satisfies the requirements here. NB he self-published both of the books listed as "bestselling" --Theredproject (talk) 02:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough coverage focused on Lee himself to pass WP:GNG. GPL93 (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see evidence of notability. -- Hoary (talk) 14:15, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.