Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Seeley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Seeley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another mayor of a small town of 1,000 residents who was elected mayor at a young age. All sources are wp:routine coverage all local politicians gets, fails wp:blp1e delete Pokerkiller (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable enough to warrant an article of its own. Kierzek (talk) 02:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep - WP:POLOUTCOMES suggests that traditionally, "politicians who (a) represent a historic first" are kept. According to List of the youngest mayors in the United States, the subject is one of eight mayors elected at the age of 18. While many of the sources are of the routine nature, his name is often mentioned in articles about other young candidates running for office. Enos733 (talk) 03:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mayor of a very small town. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete His only claim to fame is being elected at age 18, and that doesn't seem to have gotten any coverage outside of his immediate local area. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. --MelanieN (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage whatsoever and should be deleted. MrWooHoo (talk) 00:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.