Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Wolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Wolf

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable attorney. In my WP:BEFORE, I found mentions like this and this but they are not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV requirement. Gheus (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Washington, D.C.. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above and WP:TNT. His work with PLI could be notable, but the formatting and peacock language makes rescuing this page into an article beyond my patience. Bearian (talk) 07:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that the absence of one's patience or motivation to rewrite a poorly written article about a notable subject is not, in and by itself, a valid deletion criterion, regardless of the popularity of the WP:TNT essay. Cropping a promotionally-written page down to a stub requires very little effort, and no administrative tools. Please focus on the notability of the topic here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.