Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromatophonography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatophonography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A personal project that does not have significant secondary source coverage. The external links in the article do not establish notability of the subject. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 23:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- pretty blatant violation of WP:OR. Reyk _YO! 20:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Multiple searches across all found the same links listed here, not significant or notable links. SwisterTwister talk 17:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.