Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chryzinium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chryzinium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria of WP:NFILM. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources discussing this film. Proposed deletion contested by author. ... discospinster _talk 03:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails criterial for inclusion.
Delete. I feel for the author, but this film just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Distribute it on Netflix, and I might watch it. But it's not currently notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a forum for free promotion of upcoming films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources and the page creator appears to be a WP:SPA to this film and the director. Neonchameleon (talk) 22:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFILM and/or WP:CRYSTAL. I could not find any sources discussing this not-yet-released film. Also note that the film's director's Wiki page is also in AfD and looks to be failing, thus there is no reason to expect that the film will be notable even when it is released. Ivanvector (talk) 22:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as mentioned above the film has next to no coverage to meet WP:NFILM or even WP:GNG. Mkdw ^talk 00:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ONEDAY. Wikipedia needs to be based on secondary sources, especially when it comes to the notability of films. Database pages are not enough since IMDb has pages for both notable and non-notable movies. If there is coverage about this film by reliable sources, we can revisit this topic's notability. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete per WP:NOT YET (films). VMS Mosaic (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.