Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chubby Pixel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 20:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Chubby Pixel
- Chubby Pixel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Chubby Pixel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up any reliable sources. Having one game in a Humble Bundle does not mean developer is notable. Soetermans. T / C 15:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as an unnotable company. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable video game company failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Having released notable games is WP:NOTINHERITED. WP:NCORP doesn't prescribe any exemptions either. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't Steam edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 01:35, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Chubby Pixel games have been featured on a lot of important websites such as IGN Italy http://it.ign.com/woodle-tree-pc/64626/review/woodle-tree-super-mario-3d-land-per-pc, Game FAQS http://www.gamefaqs.com/pc/805522-woodle-tree-adventures, PC Rating https://pcmrating.com/games/woodle-tree-adventures, Nintendo Enthusiast http://nintendoenthusiast.com/interview/woodlee-tree-adventures-inspired-nintendo-90s-sm64-particular/, Spaziogames http://www.spaziogames.it/recensioni_videogiochi/console_multi_piattaforma/14905/woodle-tree-adventures.aspx, Moreover, the game requires a description in the Humble Bundle games lists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Humble_Bundles MalboMX —Preceding undated comment added 09:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. GameFAQs, PC Rating, Nintendo Enthusiast and Spaziogames are not a WP:VG/RS, even if you would consider them to be "important". Wikipedia cannot be the source for itself. There can still be a description of the game in the Humble Bundle games list, even without an article. IGN is a reliable source, but IGN Italy isn't listed at WP:VG/RS either. --Soetermans. T / C 11:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I just noticed this is the deletion discussion for the developer. You have to prove WP:GNG for the developer here, not the game. --Soetermans. T / C 11:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. GameFAQs, PC Rating, Nintendo Enthusiast and Spaziogames are not a WP:VG/RS, even if you would consider them to be "important". Wikipedia cannot be the source for itself. There can still be a description of the game in the Humble Bundle games list, even without an article. IGN is a reliable source, but IGN Italy isn't listed at WP:VG/RS either. --Soetermans. T / C 11:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails the WP:GNG. The collection of sources provide so are either not what Wikipedia considers reliable and/or not significant coverage about the company itself. Sergecross73 msg me 15:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this seems too soon and there's nothing to suggest better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.