Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cigar Dave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cigar Dave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to lack significant coverage by reliable third party sources. Sources are either the subject or radio stations that carry the show promoting it. Probably a good guy, probably good at his job, but not necessarily notable. Doesn't appear to pass WP:CREATIVE. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:19, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--DELETE. a lot of self-promotion, no independent sources of note.[[NotHoratio (talk) 02:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)]][reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sources do not show enough coverage to pass the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still nothing at all suggestive of the needed independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.