Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine Global

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Whether to draftify or rename can be decided by discussion on the article's talk page. Randykitty (talk) 13:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citrine Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a SPAC, but is not notable by any standard as a company. Fails WP:NCORP. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, Technology, and Thailand. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or draftify It might be early now because regulatory just passed the merger yesterday between Thailand number 2 and number 3 mobile phone operators to become the new number 1. Here is current google search for Thai name: [1] It will be publicly traded replacing existing 2 stock symbols (TRUE, DTAC) so there will be plenty of news coverage then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lerdsuwa (talk • contribs) 04:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:51, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and rename to True–DTAC merger or something similar, for now. The acquisition itself is the subject of widespread interest and news coverage, even if the significance of the company itself is still unclear. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.