Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CitySpring Infrastructure Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CitySpring Infrastructure Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Aoziwe with the following rationale " I too am not convinced as the notability of this subject. However, given their relationship to Keppel Infrastructure Trust and it seems that they are in part a sovereign wealth fund with foreign investments, I think there should be a broader community discussion at AfD before if it is to be deleted.". Fair enough, let's see if we can dig up anything to salvage this WP:YELLOWPAGES-like entry. WP:BEFORE reveals just passing mentions. The most independent one is in [1], but it does not seem likely to satisfy in-depth coverage - just a definition, in few sentences as best, as far as I can make it out from the snippet. Other sources are in passing, press-releases, and such. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:07, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails notability. WP:TNT. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 09:42, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Being a subsidiary of a SWF shouldn't be a criteria for notability (no inherited notability as per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). Only recent notable event in Singapore news is a merger of a Keppel Infrastructure Trust. Other news are routine financial announcements and analysis. [2] robertsky (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.