Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CleanGenius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CleanGenius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This piece of software does not seem to be significant or notable, as I am unable to find any reliable secondary sources that cover it. Most of the sources for this article are primary, and of the three non-primary sources, two are just websites that reupload application downloads and one I'm not sure about. Still, I don't think coverage in one potentially reliable source is enough to qualify an entire article. Plus, the creator of the article was blocked for only making advertising edits, making it a conflict of interest. --StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: cannot find anything beyond routine, cursory reviews in trade magazines. Owen× ☎ 14:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above JM (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.