Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinked
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Clinked
- Clinked (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company / software. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Created by Special:Contributions/Rich_andersson with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article authored by a disclosed employee of the company originating the software and describing its features and funding history. Neither reaching the semi-final for a Cisco British Innovation Award nor an earlier Red Herring 100 Europe Award is sufficient to establish encyclopaedic notability for the software, and my searches are not finding better. Fails WP:NSOFT, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.