Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloudMounter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per G11. (non-admin closure) – The Grid (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CloudMounter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this notable? Seems like an advertisement. -- Beland (talk) 06:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 06:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - It does get some mentions in books such as [1] and Mac magazines, but these are neither significant coverage nor in any way exceptional. It sits along side mention of countless other applications that are of use but none of which are significant enough for an encylopaedia article. This page reads like a promotional piece (per nom) and if it were re-written with NPOV it would just be the basic description of what the app does. It is not unique. Mountain Duck (no article) and Cyberduck do the same thing among others. Being open source, there is a bit more to say about Cyberduck, but should that be considered at AfD too? Cloud mounting is, in any case, only marketing speak for long established Virtual file system concepts and the application merely rolls multiple network filestore mounting options into one - and it was not the first to do so by any means. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy G11. I've tagged as such. GoldenRing (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not a single reference, clearly very promotional, and add onto that that the article's creator is a blocked sockpuppet... Definitely doesn't belong here. PopoDameron (talk) 16:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I've speedied as it unquestionably meets the criteria for both A7 and G11. Deb (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.