Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud Chip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud Chip

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This unreferenced article is either:

Promoting CloudChips' products (its website appears defunct) or technology by associating its concept of a cloud chip with that of an experiment Intel processor that coincidentally has a similar name
It's attempting to invent a neologism by synthesizing a definition from things that have "cloud chip" in their name or that have been as described as such. 99Electrons (talk) 03:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per WP:NEO. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SwagGangster ^• 03:56, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 03:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article is a definition of an old concept trying to promote a likely finished company. GN-z11 ^☎ ^★ 07:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the article probably verges on TNT, but the term seems notable and refers to products by different companies - e.g. Microsoft 2018, Cambricon Technology (China). I would lean towards a redirect if there is a suitable developed target Icewhiz (talk) 11:18, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Manycore processor. The name is a plausible search term and may warrant a full article (but not at present state). Icewhiz (talk) 11:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: "Cloud chip" might be a plausible search term, but it's sufficiently ambiguous that redirecting it to Manycore processor is pointless. "Cloud chip" literally means "an integrated circuit designed for use by cloud computing". Thus, redirecting it to a specific type of integrated circuit (a many-core processor) is arbitrary, and doesn't make much sense. 99Electrons (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.