Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud Nine (Expression)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Cloud Nine (Expression)
- Cloud Nine (Expression) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure WP:DICTDEF, already sufficiently covered in the Cloud Nine dab page. Toddst1 (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I had PRODded this as a WP:DICTDEF and the original author removed the prod. I agree with Toddst1's rationale that the coverage at the Cloud Nine page (including the link there to the Wiktionary page wikt:cloud nine) is sufficient. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. shoy (reactions) 16:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. If anything, create a redirect to Wiktionary. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 23:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - per Nom. InsertCleverPhraseHere 05:49, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.