Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloverSac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CloverSac

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a year old company. The article sources seem to be entirely blogs, many of which are likely affiliate marketing blogs. I am unable to find any reliable sources that cover the subject in detail. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - Mr X 14:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 14:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 14:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I simply see no convincingly better improvement but feel free to draft and userfy if needed. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. not even the blogs that list it are major. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.