Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clydach Farm Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clydach Farm Group

Clydach Farm Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

speedy declined so bringing it here...completely fails WP:GNG non notable business which employs 12 people! Theroadislong (talk) 21:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it "completely fails" it, how come a news search brings up two hits? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK... is two hits enough to justify a stand-alone article? Theroadislong (talk) 22:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clydach Farm Group, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.