Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coco Moon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Owl City discography#Studio albums. ✗plicit 03:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coco Moon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLARed this but it was undone so now we're here. To quote my reasoning from before:As it stands, the article has not changed since then aside from a couple adjusted time stamps. I still stand by PMStudio being unreliable and even brought up a query about it here. My vote is to restore the redirect I made earlier, though if anyone wants to take what's here and expand the prose in Owl City#2022–present: Return of Owl City and Coco Moon then that would be an even better target. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Minnesota. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Owl City discography or nominator's original suggestion, Owl City § 2022–present: Return of Owl City and Coco Moon (for the time being), and only bring back once professional reviews come in. (Coincidentally, I was looking up their 2009 one-hit wonder "Fireflies" on a whim yesterday evening!) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 09:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : That being said, what is the likelihood of using these sources?

https://www.easyrock.com.ph/news/owl-city-announces-new-album-coco-moon/

https://www.argusleader.com/story/opinion/voices/2023/03/27/owl-city-wrote-a-6-minute-song-about-rapid-city-south-dakota-dinosaur-park-skyline-drive-coco-moon/70051769007/

https://news3lv.com/news/local/owl-city-to-perform-at-brooklyn-bowl-in-las-vegas-this-fall-nevada-tickets-on-sale-friday-augustana-fireflies-you-would-not-believe-your-eyes-october-6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shout4Serenity (talk • contribs) 06:46, April 14, 2023 (UTC)

The first and third links are both based on press releases so are essentially WP:PRIMARY. That's the same issue as with PMStudio. The Argus Leader article, however, looks to be quite useful. Good find. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 10:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That Argus Leader is the only review I can find. Is one review enough for MUSIC? Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you're talking about the article linked above, that's about just one song and hardly mentions the album beyond the one track. And generally, I've seen a lot of albums with single reviews from much more notable publications (especially AllMusic) die in AfDs, so I'm gonna say no. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ok, I guess it's a delete for me then, for the lack of sourcing/reviews of the album Oaktree b (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something something WP:ATD-R means redirecting is preferred so the delete vote can essentially be substituted with a redirect vote as well or however that works (or @Oaktree b could just throw explicit support behind redirecting as an option). As for the target, Owl City discography#Studio albums might be the better of the two since it already also mentions the album charting and users can navigate more quickly to other releases from there.

It is also worth noting that no new coverage appears to have come in for this album and it is now nearly a month old so I doubt any more reviews will be cropping up. Unless it hits a sudden sales spike and charts far more impressively, or makes a bunch of mid-year best albums lists in a few weeks, I don't see this reaching notability anytime soon. Keepability seems like a complete non-question to me, regardless of what other option we end up with. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not opposed to a redirect. Oaktree b (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have found a recent source talking about Owl City's new album Coco Moon. I have added it in the article for now, however, I am unsure if its still sufficient to keep the page around, but I'll leave the link here in case anyone wants to review it.

https://popcrush.com/owl-city-the-tornado-screamo-reactions/ Shout4Serenity (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Owl City discography fails GNG for a stand alone article. // Timothy :: talk 04:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.