Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodeBase (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CodeBase (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A self-published book. No reliable sources to be found. Doesn't pass WP:NBOOK. Prod was removed for unknown reasons Bgwhite (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article asserted some notability by way of a notable person endorsing it, but I can't find anything that actually backs that claim up. Even if it was sourced, we need more than one review to show notability. This seems to be your standard, run-of-the-mill, non-notable self-published book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also note that the creator of the article is the book's author and that this is the second attempt at creating an article for the book. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Self-published, does not meet notability criteria specified in Wikipedia:Notability (books). -- The Anome (talk) 09:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.