Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code of a Killer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. — Wyliepedia 19:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Code of a Killer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, WP:FFILM — Wyliepedia 05:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn by nominator: There are far worse examples out there, and this nom is heading into the fog. CoaK just needs more sources, as suggested here. — Wyliepedia 19:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you find it necessary to delete it, go ahead. I'm not going to stop you. I'll save the current article code in my sandbox, edit it until its okay for republish. What needs changing? And to comply with WP:TOOSOON, when is a reasonable time to republish it? Thanks. --Limbsaw 10:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Click on the part in the quotation marks above, or Google for more sources. It needs more than a press release from the network. — Wyliepedia 11:14, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Keep This is already being discussed among entertainment outlets even though it's not a long way through its production cycle. I see no reason to remove the article. It has received some significant and in depth coverage, The coverage has spanned over a week and will likely crop up among entertainment news for some time. There has been national coverage, There has been German coverage. A rewrite certainly, and a close eye kept on it but I think it may well end up staying. SPACKlick (talk) 11:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.